Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports

UCLA Basketball: Re-examining Bryce Alford

One of the dominant story-lines headed into the 2013-14 UCLA hoops season revolved around its point guard, in that the Bruins appeared to be without one.

When Steve Alford took the UCLA gig, he brought with him his son, freshman point guard Bryce Alford. Because of UCLA fans’ uneasy reaction to the hiring of Alford, his son immediately got the brunt of the vitriol, with the fan-base ready to pounce on the frosh due to his status as a scholarship athlete under daddy dearest. It didn’t take much for the UCLA fan-base to turn on the younger Alford.

Déjà vu, right?

Back in Ben Howland’s final season, that same point guard problem surfaced, but the Bruins lucked into a much-improved Larry Drew II. The transfer from North Carolina was heavily scrutinized among the Tar Heel faithful and mocked by the UCLA fan-base. Drew II — the third UNC-to-UCLA transfer — was lobbied against hard as the team’s primary ball-handler, and fans were immediately angered by Howland’s decision to let Drew II man the Bruin offense over freshman Kyle Anderson.

Well, we know how that turned out.

Drew II would turn in statistically one of the best seasons by a point guard in UCLA history, eclipsing Pooh Richardson’s record for most assists in a season. He’d have one of the highest assist-turnover ratios in the country and he’d go on to give a moving, tearful reaction to Jordan Adams’ ankle injury in the Pac-12 tournament that earned him the affection of UCLA fans everywhere.

Though Bryce Alford hasn’t shed a tear for anyone just yet, it’s clear that his status’s trajectory among the fan-base is mirroring Drew’s.

Of course, much of his working into UCLA fans’ good will has to do with his play.

If you haven’t been paying attention, Bryce Alford started the season shooting 4-for-13, earning five assists and three turnovers in his first two games. The scrutiny among UCLA fans became rather intolerable for even the most rational human being (and as a side note, yours truly was behind much of the loud criticism thrown Alford’s way).

Since then, Alford has done a commendable job in leading the Bruins’ explosive and energetic second unit, headlined by Zach LaVine. Though LaVine is clearly the star for UCLA coming off the bench, his pairing with the coach’s son has been rather fruitful.

Because Alford’s producing on the floor, in the playing time he has. Earning a PER of 17.5, Alford’s managed an effective field goal percentage of 62.3, shooting at a 52 percent clip from 2-point range, while also hitting a ridiculous 47 percent of his threes.

All while earning 3.5 assists per turnover, a team best. When Alford’s on the floor, 23 percent of his teammates’ field goals can be attributed to an Alford assist.

To his credit, the frosh has done a fine job in reeling in his own talents. It appeared at the beginning of the season, Alford’s confidence got the best of him. Indeed, an eye test may confirm that Alford took way too many contested outside shots, held on to the ball for far too long, and often turned over possession due to his overly-excitable ball-handling.

Much of those issues have disappeared, though, now that Alford’s comfortable and playing within himself. Sure, he may get a tad too confident once in awhile, but his overzealous shot-taking has largely taken care of itself. Defensively, there isn’t much improvement, but Steve Alford’s clever employment of the zone often masks the serious deficiencies his son Bryce has on that end of the floor.

All this is to say that Alford wasn’t as bad as we thought. And though he likely won’t bully himself into the starting line-up anytime soon, one can imagine a scenario (way) down the road in which the coach’s kid takes over the reigns of his dad’s offense.

Regardless, good on Alford for silencing the critics. He’s got some more winning over to do, but it appears he’s well on his way to doing so.

Dick's Sporting Goods presents "Hell Week":

Tags: Basketball UCLA Bruins

  • neil kaufman

    if bruin nation is the fox news of the web this is the truth dig. go bruins

  • Biglar

    Thanks for the rational viewpoint. B. Alford gets a terrible rap from hyperbolic, know-nothing “experts” on other boards who never let the facts or stats get in the way of their “opinion”. He’s a freshman who has never played at an elite level before, and has shown steady improvement this year. I think we can also look forward to him steadily improving over his four years at UCLA, especially on the defensive side. While he may never be the athlete that allows him to be a defensive stopper a la Malcolm Lee, smart players like Alford can learn how to play effective defense against superior athletes. If you look back to the last heralded point guard to attend UCLA – Jerime Anderson, you see that despite the incoming plaudits, he was lousy his freshman year, and between boneheaded plays on and off the court, effectively stayed lousy the entire time he was at UCLA despite superior athletic skills. I’ll take Alford, thank you.

  • Larry Sailer

    Why all this crap about UCLA fans fighting back against Larry Drew II, and putting Bryce Alford through intolerable scrutiny? For some reason. Bleacher Report writers have a habit of nonsense hyperbole when talking about certain Bruin coaches and players. The fact is that some — a relatively few — UCLA fans have and had said unkind (read nasty) things about some team coaches and players, but most Bruins fans have been pretty tolerant and have not rushed to judgement.

    • GoJoeBruinUCLA

      As someone who initiated the concept of #uclatwitter, who has been around the ucla fan-base for 2 years now, who keeps up with countless UCLA facebook groups, who frequents multiple messageboards … I would say I have a good sense of the fan-base. Thx for the input, though.


  • Oz Waheed is a useless fan-site. It’s like the Paula Abdul of American Idol: overly positive and in denial.

    • neil kaufman

      now, if you said that on bruin nation you would be banned, right?